Enid Lee, Incorporating Antiracism Essay

In Taking Multicultural, Antiracist Education Seriously, Barbara Miner interviews Enid lee side, a attracter in antiracist education as noned on her website, Enidlee. com. She pushes for the use of the limit antiracist because the tem currently in use, multicultural, is too nice, tapering more on food and fun rather than hard issues of racism. Although her interview is inspiring and rattling necessary, some facets of her presentation seem to swing to far to the militant post to garner widespread acceptance. First, lee explains that in many schools, European posters, readings, games and activities find the landscape.While I believe this is true in some cases, I do not believe it to be true in on the whole cases. Many, many classrooms in which I have learned, observed and taught have been change with pictures of prominent white, black, Hispanic and Asian authors, researchers, and political leaders. Lees multistage cuddle to antiracist education is clear and organized and se quentially stepped so as not to seem overly forceful. However, her insistent on the use of antiracist is a issue harsh in that it assumes that anything not adopted or previous to this tonic ideology is racist. That is a huge overgeneralization.It also separates people into groups the antiracists and everyone else, who, by association, must be racist. I do not think that many humankind school systems, and certainly no private systems, will purchase curricular materials and send teachers and administrators to antiracist workshops because it implies the worst of these people and materials. Lee can simply not make that kind of generalization. She urges the changes to extend beyond the school. Racism is alive and surface in the community, but her approach sends the wrong message We have an antiracist excogitation to change this racist community. That is the message that people will hear.A little forceful message is much preferable to Lees approach. Lee is convincing in her devoti on to creating antiracist schools. She urges to push for administrative changes and curricular changes, which she admits ar financially blockaded by under-funded school districts. She gives an unsubstantiated claim that multicultural, antiracist programs are the most under-funded, when the removal of arts programs in elementary schools has made the matter media several times in the last few years.Finally, after admitting the misfortunate lack of money for programs, she launches on her website, a national push for her witness conference called Putting Equity on the Table that costs $1450 for deuce school officials to attend. This is a three day conference and the rate (which is the earlyish bird rate) does not include the hotel fee at the Hampton Inn in downtown Boston. In addition, the recommended reading resource is entitled Education Children of African Ancestry in the United States of America, Canada, and the United Kingdom.If we are truly talk of the town about an antirac ist education, why does our primary conference resource only focus on one race? Nobody will fault Enid Lee and others like her for taking on the cause of equity in education. all the way the past has shown that steps are necessary. However, Lees focus on only African-descended children, on an inflammatory name for her type of education (which, oddly, does not appear on her conference registration information), and on her need to delegacy exorbitant fees for her conference detract from her credibility and are likely to be off-putting for widespread educators.