'Over the Hedge Essay\r'

'Over the surround is an animated fool about the difficulties brusk harmless animals experience when homosexual encroaches on their habitat (Fry, 2006). The fool triggers with the end of spend and the animals in the forest are culmination out of hibernation. A hyperactive and fuddled raccoon named RJ forages on the junk nutrient of the bear; he escapes a reside with the auspicate of returning all of the bear’s fodder indoors a week. On the different side, a family of cute pocket-sized animals awakens with a green wall in the middle of their forest and suddenly fears what lies beyond the defer.\r\n life force the turtle ventures over the outwit to find out what was on the early(a) side; merely he was subjected to the angered human machines like the lawn mower, grass sprinkler, bikes and etcetera He returns to the forest and warns that no superstar should ever venture over the hedge as it is dangerous. The group of animals however had other problem, they ha d no food. Then here comes, the rapscallion raccoon RJ and convinces the group that humans halt out their food e genuinely prison term and all they needed to do was go out there and gather it.\r\nVerve disagreed and warned them against the idea, but as food became infrequent Verve finally agreed with RJ. RJ on the other hand was rightfully persuasion of how the group could help him gather the food he owed the bear and here the difference started. The rest of the film tells about friendship, trust, m singley plant and love of family. The film does this effectively within the context of man’s environmental responsibility to be stewards of Mother Nature. The dapple of the story was actually very unprejudiced however, since the characters were cute, furry, funny and adorable animals, the film held some(prenominal) interest.\r\nThe visuals were very good; it was clear, crisp and very alive. Although one would nonice that it was not created in the traditional way, in fact the impression’s animation were all information processing system generated, from the drawing to the filming. The sound was in the stock Dolby format, and it was clear and loud, however some of the characters dialogues were tweaked to resemble that of the animal, sometimes the dialogue got lost in the way it was pronounced but one could still understand the gist of the sentence.\r\nI especially liked the three featherbed possums because they were accreditedly cute, and they were very funny. They had this way of construction things in chorus and then either refuting or supporting each other and their intellections resembled the candidness of children. The vividness of the colors and images really fed my interest in the film, however I was lost in the breathe of the squirrel and the farting of the skunk, maybe the director thought it would add to the comedic element of the film, but it did not feel that way to me.\r\nThe film dialogue about the importance of living soundly with our animal friends, and it shows a very real example of how man react to animals when they start invading our homes and community. The film however had the mogul to make us realize that man had been the first to invade the animals’ home and since they ca-ca their food from their ecosystem, man’s infringement of their habitat also affects their existence (Peabody, 2006). The film is far from serious and boring, it is funny, entertaining and honest, and brutally honest I must say.\r\nThe film actually appealed to my sense of justice and comparison knowing that man and beast should live together in the best assertable way. Although, the film was targeted for children of all ages, some of the dialogues were bald and crude, thus the film landed in the PG rating, but all the same it contains the all-important(a) elements of a good story, interesting characters, excellent animation and great actors and this held my interest in the film until its end.\r\n '