Polarization in the Political System

On Tuesday, November 14, 1995, in what has been perceived as the years biggest non-event, the national establishment shut down whole non-essential services due to what was, for all intents and purposes, a game of national chicken amongst the indorse Speaker and the President. And, at an estimated cost of 200 million dollars a day, this dubious battle of dueling egos did not come cheap (Bradsher, 1995, p.16). why do politicians find it almost congenitally impossible to cooperate? What is it astir(predicate) politics and prop angiotensin converting enzyment that reckon to always put them at odds with good giving medication activity? Indeed, is an effective, headspring run government even possible given the present-day(prenominal) adversarial relationship among our devil main semi semipolitical parties? It would seem that the exercise of power for its own sake, and a competitive berth in which one side essential always twin the other on any issue, is incompatible with the cooperation and compromise obligatory for the government to function. As the United States becomes more extreme in its beliefs in general, assemblage polarization and opposition, which requires a mutual exclusivity of determination attainment, will crown to more showdown situations in which the remnant of good government gives way to political posturing and power-mongering. In this paper I will analyze recent political appearance in terms of two factors: Group behavior with an emphasis on polarization, and competition. However, one should keep in attend that these two factors argon interrelated.

Group polarization tends to exacerbate inter-grou! p competition by impetuous any two groups who initially disagree farther isolated in their respective views. In turn, a competitive situation in which one side must lose in order for the other to win (and political situations are well always competitive), will codify the differences between groups - leading to just extremism by those seeking power in spite of appearance the group - and thus, to further group polarization. In the above example, the two main combatants, plug-in Clinton and Newt Gingrich, were virtually forced to take uncompromising, disparate views because of... If you deficiency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper